Tagged: NOMAR

Link, not Zelda.

My most recent Fire Brand post.

Anyone wonder how much more of an opportunity CF’s have than corner OF’s in terms of tracking down batted balls?  Read this Dave Cameron post.  Well, you don’t have to read it.  I will just tell you what I am referring to. 

In 2008, fly-balls were distributed like this around the majors:  27% to LF, 48% to CF, and 23% to RF.  So anyone wondering why Fred Lynn had more defensive value than Jim Rice, simply based on opportunity, is because Lynn impacted the team in a greater way.  A CF has more opportunity to impact the game than that of a corner OF.  So an average CF > average LF or RF.  Something that must be taken into account when comparing Ted Williams and Joe Dimaggio.  Although, I think Williams still comes out on top. 

A great post about my all-time favorite player. 

Advertisement

Is Nomar More Valuable Than Jeter?

Article

That is the title of the article that I found on ESPN.  And I can’t believe it but I might agree…if seasons lasted only 55 games…or 62 games…or 81 games…Those are three of the past five seasons that Nomar has played.  His numbers for a middle infielder haven’t fallen off the map.  The problem is that he really isn’t a middle infielder anymore.  The other problem is that he has fallen off the map.  At least the ballparks map, because he doesn’t play enough. 

If Nomar played SS full time, could he be roughly what Jeter is defensively?  Possibly even better, but that isn’t really saying all that much.  It isn’t a question of whether or not Nomar can hit like a middle infielder when he actually plays.  We know that he can.  Three of his last four seasons have been OPS+’s of 97, 105, and 122.  With one aberration of 78.  Nomar is a better hitter than that 78.  But he isn’t a middle infielder all that much, and he does not play enough games to begin with. 

As for the actual premise of the article.  It defends Nomar as being a “useful” player.  Please define “useful” for me though.  I for one would not feel comfortable penciling in Nomar’s name on the lineup card unless I had a viable starting SS waiting behind him.  It is unrealistic to expect more than 120 games from Garciaparra at this stage in his career, and even that may be too much.  I guess between 100-120 would be a safe bet, but having him as a utility infielder makes much more sense. 

As a utility player, Nomar and “useful” make much more sense.  Garciaparra can play all four infield positions if needed, and a team could work in enough AB’s I would think for him to be “useful.” 

But at what price?  A few million wouldn’t be bad, but the risk is so great for Nomar, and he isn’t exactly a brilliant defensive player at any of the positions he can play.  Nor is he always on base.  Nor does he slug like he used to. 

I have no problem with Nomar being referred to as “useful,” when it is used in the right context.  But I do have a problem with him being in the same category as Jeter when it comes to “value.”  Jeter can play 150 games in a season, with ease.  Nomar cannot.  When Nomar stays healthy long enough, then maybe we can compare the two, more so.  But Nomar is not going to experience consistent good health at this stage in his career, not when he hasn’t experienced it during much of his first 12 seasons.

And this is coming from one of Nomar’s biggest supporters.  From someone that wants nothing more, as far as baseball is concerned, but for Nomar Garciaparra to have success as an everyday player again.